Representations of Freedom - Degas, David and Greuze Essay

Representations of Freedom - Degas, David and Greuze - Essay Example The essay "Representations of Freedom - Degas, David and Greuze" gives a review of paintings of Degas, David and Greuze. The paper also discovers familial representations of freedom in their works. Degas’ early works, which dealt with his own family members, showed that the matriarchal figure was in a state of repression due to the bourgeois class style in which they were living. In his later works, such as the brothel series, a freedom of individuality and family values were shown. The painting by Degas, Name Day of the Madam, shows a madam and her concubines looking towards her in ultimate respect, whereas in the familial paintings of his own family Degas’ showed that there was no respect given to the patriarch of the family. Degas used the brothel to show that even though the whores sold themselves for other people’s sexual desires, they are freer to act as a family, than the bourgeois families where the patriarch ruled with an iron fist. Furthermore, he also represented the fact that the bourgeois families act more like a forced business decision where discontent and discord is prevalent. Jaques-Louis David’s painting, The Sabine Women, shows that family life and values tended to be freeing themselves from the repression of antiquity. Thus, while working on the painting, he had stated to his students that his approach to his painting would be to hearken back to the Greek style and out of the repressive, constrictive style of the Romans. He, also, suggested the idea of paying an entry fee.

Video case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Video - Case Study Example The sponsors of the project brought together US army, US navy requirements for a fighting plane into a single design. They demanded supersonic, single-engine, single-seat that is stealth, short take-off, multirole features and vertical landing (Rinaldi, 2001). At the top of the requirement list is efficiency in cost while assembling all features from the predecessor plane into one. The top-level requirement was to land vertically, take-off at shorter runways and remain invisible to enemies in war. JSF program came into being under a program structure that had a basis of a complicated set of association that brings together government Department of Defense (DOD) and industry players Boeing and Lockheed Martin. In addition, on board were eight other partners including Canada, UK, and Australia. The development was shaped in a competition outfit given to Boeing and Lockheed-Martin for a period of four years, which took the government a total of $200 billion. The SJF program in design focused on coming up with a solution to the challenges the partners explained they faced in air combat planes. The focus by Boeing included improving on affordability, the capability to perform while it remains a fighter machine. The design focused on takeoff and landing approaches to a superior war-based machine. The takeoff was to be a short runway and a vertical landing. They came up with refined empennage that had horizontal tails to enhance control power. They maintained the leading-edge sweep of the delta wing for speeds and stealth merits. Moreover, they came up with an aft-sweeping chin inlet, which is regarded lighter with superior aerodynamic performance for the attack. From the earlier F-22 raptor, F-16 version, the decided to maintain wing sweep, vertical tail, fore-body and wingspan with addition of diagonal fins. They also adopted the low weight and simple machine for a direct lift design (Rinaldi,